Can we still say that raising cattle is land intensive compared with farming wheat?Why or why not?

In the U.S where land is cheap, the ratio of land to labor used in cattle raising is higher than that of land used in wheat growing. But in more crowded countries, where land is expensive and labor is cheap, it is common to raise cows by using less land more labor than Americans use to grow wheat. Can we still say that raising cattle is land intensive compared with farming wheat?Why or why not?

Answer:
Raising cattle is never more land intensive compared to growing wheat or other vegetable products, simply because grazing animals are inefficient producers of edible flesh. In countries where meat is used more as a condiment than as the main source of protein in the diet, half an acre is sufficient to grow food for one person. It takes eight times more land to produce meat than grain for the same amount of food energy, as outlined in the following article:

http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-30610-201-1-do_...

The answers post by the user, for information only, FunQA.com does not guarantee the right.



More Questions and Answers:
  • What does the term "market avoidance" mean?
  • What is the rationale for discrimination?
  • Investment tips for 15 yr old with $800?
  • System of water in urban areas as well as rural areas?
  • What could we say about the pattern of production and trade in this case?
  • How does ridding the deficit sound by using all remaining money, and creating tons of fake $ for the citizens?
  • Which state of USA richest?
  • Company factories tying to give poor countries reallly high wages?
  • How to determine currency rate?